- #Ironcad vs inventor install
- #Ironcad vs inventor update
- #Ironcad vs inventor trial
- #Ironcad vs inventor license
Swx can send assembly features back to part level, inventor can not.
#Ironcad vs inventor update
The geometry is a "snapshot" of the geometry when projected, and if the parent geometry changes, does not update (Yes I know there is a work around, but Swx does not need a work around) Copied straight from the help Projected cut edges are not associative in a sketch. Swx is fully associative, Inventor is not. Swx handles topology changes much better.
#Ironcad vs inventor install
Inventor has more control over adding balloons in drawings.Įxcept for Autocad, I don't use any of the other software bundled with the suite, I don't even install it. Inventors derive feature is far superior. Inventor has far superior BOM management.īoth are user friendly and easy to learn. Here is what I have found over the years. I have used both, currently using Inventor, might be switching back to Swx. Personally, I would be looking for a smooth workflow with my collaborators and an enjoyable daily experience.
The initial investment will soon be written off. Who are you most likely to share data with? What do they need?Įither package will do what you want.
What CAD format are they looking for as a deliverable? My recommendation its that you start with your customers. Solidworks seems to be more popular with industrial designers and small independent job shops, while inventor is more popular in general engineering.Īutodesk have the advantage in multidisciplinary companies who need a solution for Civil or BIM alongside mechanical design. Inventor seems to have more tools for mechanical design, such as the design accelerators. You can build the same things in Inventor, but it might take more steps. Solidworks has more options for surfacing. Your reseller can sell you Inventor on its own if you want - at a cheaper price than Solid works (they don't advertise this option much!).
#Ironcad vs inventor license
The price you quoted is for a joint license of AutoCAD and Inventor. Is there something specific or unique that you need to be able to do if you provide typical examples (or even simplified versions thereof), we might be able to provide an indication of how easy/difficult what you want/need is to accomplish in the various software packages. While the user interface between the different software packages will be different, the approach to creating stable parts and assemblies is essentially the same. If you are evaluating them yourself, create the same set of parts, assemblies, drawings, etc. in each software to understand where are their strengths and weaknesses.ĭon't expect to instantly become proficient on any of the software packages taking a course at the local technical institute or collage will provide a good foundation but each software package will have its own particularities - some things will be easier to accomplish in one package than in the others and vice versa. You might even consider having your VAR do a demonstration of the software using one of your typical parts (or a simplified version thereof) for evaluation of the whole process.
#Ironcad vs inventor trial
I want to make sure I spend the money wisely.Īs twinz3950 suggested, obtain trial versions of the various software packages you are considering I believe that most have a 30 day trial version that you can either download online or acquire from your local VAR (Value Added Reseller).
0 kommentar(er)
